Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision concerning&nbsp;<a href="http://visit.wnj.com/e/4002/opinions-17pdf-17-494-j4el-pdf/5c6qxz/819814921" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.</a>&nbsp;dramatically changes the ability of a state to tax the sales of an out-of-state seller of goods. The decision overturned the physical presence stance in&nbsp;<a href="http://visit.wnj.com/e/4002/es-federal-us-504-298-case-pdf/5c6qy2/819814921" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Quill v. North Dakota</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://visit.wnj.com/e/4002/s-federal-us-386-753-case-html/5c6qy4/819814921" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">National Bellas Hess v. Department of Revenue of Ill</a>. This means that states are now able to require out-of-state retailers to collect and remit state sales/use taxes on sales to in-state customers, even though the retailer has no “physical presence” nexus in the state.

contentpilot/introduction

Under this “physical presence” test required under the Supreme Court’s 1992&nbsp;Quill&nbsp;decision, a seller must generally have an office, other place of business&nbsp;or employees in the taxing state in order to have sufficient nexus to be required to collect sales/use taxes from the in-state purchaser. The&nbsp;Wayfair&nbsp;Court overturned the&nbsp;Quill&nbsp;“physical presence” nexus test and found that there is sufficient nexus to require out-of-state retailers to collect and remit South Dakota sales/use tax, when an out-of-state retailer has South Dakota sales of more than $100,000 in a year or 200 (or more) separate sales to South Dakota residents during the year.

core/paragraph

The&nbsp;Wayfair&nbsp;Court found that the&nbsp;Quill&nbsp;“physical presence” test did not make sense in today’s e-commerce economy. The Court pointed out that mail order sales activity at the time of the&nbsp;Quill&nbsp;decision was approximately $180 billion, while e-commerce sales in 2017 were estimated at $453.5 billion, and when combined with traditional remote sales totaled more than $500 billion. The Court stated that the&nbsp;Quill&nbsp;test gives online sellers an unfair advantage over brick-and-mortar sellers. The Court also pointed out that the “physical presence” test has resulted in a significant loss of revenue to states imposing a sales/use tax. Estimates of this revenue loss range from $8 billion to $33 billion. While online purchasers are generally required to report and pay use tax in their home state, there is substantial noncompliance with these rules. &nbsp;

The Supreme Court found that the $100,000/200 sales test in the South Dakota statute, and the lack of retroactivity, means that the statute does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce. While the Supreme Court upheld the South Dakota statute, it did not establish a sales/use tax nexus rule applicable to all states. The decision therefore leaves many unanswered questions, such as whether lower threshold amounts would provide sufficient nexus. Another issue to address is whether higher thresholds may be permitted in states with larger populations than South Dakota.

Although unanswered questions remain, the&nbsp;Wayfair&nbsp;decision nevertheless substantially changed the landscape for online sellers. Other states are expected to impose similar sales/use tax collection requirements. Stay tuned. &nbsp;

If you are interested in learning more about this recent decision and other tax issues affecting your business, please contact Sean Cook, Jay Kennedy, Stephen Kretschman or your Warner attorney.

Partner

Sean H. Cook

Of Counsel

Jay A. Kennedy

Corporate

U.S. Supreme Court’s Wayfair Decision Overturns “Physical Presence” Nexus Requirement for Collection of Sales Tax

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000.

U.S. Supreme Court’s Wayfair Decision Overturns “Physical Presence” Nexus Requirement for Collection of Sales Tax

professionals