Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

Chief Justice Young and Justice Joan Larsen have recused themselves from participating in two cases challenging the recount of votes by the Board of State Canvassers because President-Elect Donald Trump is a party to one of the cases and they both appear on Trump's list of 21 potential nominees to fill the vacancy on the United States Supreme Court.  See<em> <a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/154886_63_01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald J Trump v Board of State Canvassers</a></em><a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/154886_63_01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">, No 335958</a> and <a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/154886_64_01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Attorney General v Board of State Canvassers</em> No. 335947</a>.  Justice Larson readily recused herself, whereas Chief Justice Young did so only reluctantly, stating that "anybody can make a list" and the chances of being selected from the list is remote and both “speculatively hypothetical and in his case, improbable.”  The Court highlighted the duty to sit is required because justices who recuse themselves cannot be replaced. Thus, their disqualification alters the composition of the Court that the citizens have chosen thereby disrupting the decision-making process in a particular case. Neither Chief Justice Young nor Justice Larsen sought inclusion on the list and both disclaimed any notice or contact with the President-Elect.

contentpilot/introduction

Though Chief Justice Young highlighted that recusal is mandated only when a judge is actually biased and cannot impartially hear a case, both disclaimed any actual bias and no one claimed otherwise. The justices instead granted the motion for disqualification because of the unique circumstances of the case and to avoid any perceived conflict. Interestingly, the Chief Justice noted that this case in particular called out for judicial restraint, and strongly suggested that his classmate, United States District Court Judge Mark Goldsmith, should have exercised more restraint, rather than ordering the recount to begin earlier than state laws allowed.

core/paragraph

Partner

Gaëtan Gerville-Réache

Labor and Employment

Two MSC justices recuse themselves, leaving 5 to hear a recount petition appeal

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

Two MSC justices recuse themselves, leaving 5 to hear a recount petition appeal

professionals