Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

Retirement plans of subsidiaries are often afterthoughts for parent companies. It’s easy for the plan of a subsidiary owned by the parent to slip down the list of priorities or, similarly, for the plan of a brother-sister company (while this article does not specifically address brother-sister companies, the issues raised are similar) to slip down the list or escape attention.

contentpilot/introduction

Waiting too long, though, can lead to problems that could have been avoided. We often find this is due to a lack of awareness of the risks involved with delaying. The risks include:

core/paragraph

core/list

Tax qualification can be a problem if the plan documents have inconsistent terms. For example, it’s often missed that the definition of a “highly compensated employee” (HCE) must be the same across all plans of related companies.&nbsp;

We also regularly see small subsidiary plans using a prototype plan document that says all employees of all related companies (meaning the parent’s employees too) are eligible when that is not the intent.&nbsp;

If the IRS identifies this, it may force the companies to make extra contributions for employees.

Tax qualification is also tied to the operation of both plans. Regular coverage testing must be done looking at data of all related companies, even if those companies have different plans. Frequently at least one of the plans is at risk of failing (which can be costly to fix).

Another challenge is managing fiduciary risk. Small subsidiary plans are often invested in lower quality investments and paying higher fees for recordkeeping and investment advice because the parent’s bargaining power hasn’t&nbsp;been tapped.&nbsp;

The parent and subsidiary both need to consider whether they can defend such a difference and they should expect&nbsp;this issue to be raised if the plan comes under scrutiny by a court or on an audit.

Once you have a situation where a parent and subsidiary have different plans, it’s challenging to merge the plans without having to change the parent’s plan to carry forward terms of the subsidiary’s plan (which was probably designed with less thought about administration for a large group). Often it’s difficult to change the terms. Federal law limits the changes that can be made to benefits that are “protected.” What is protected can be fairly broad. Terminating the subsidiary plan generally doesn’t&nbsp;avoid this problem because the special protections may still carry over to the parent’s plan.

Here are some tips for dealing with a subsidiary’s plan.

This list isn’t exhaustive. These situations can be complicated and require analysis of the specific facts. The key is recognizing there are reasons to prioritize a subsidiary’s plan and planning helps avoid costly problems. 

Partner

Heidi A. Lyon

Employee Benefits

The Forgotten Subsidiary Retirement Plan

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

The Forgotten Subsidiary Retirement Plan

professionals