Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

Widespread use of facial recognition technology is inevitable. To date, industry–leading companies have shown remarkable restraint in implementing such features. Google has <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jun/03/google-glass-facial-recognition-ban" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">banned</a> facial recognition apps on its Glass headset, and Facebook has refrained from rolling out the technology to the degree that it could, although it's <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/facebook-may-add-your-profile-photo-facial-recognition-database-8C11030921" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">inching</a> further in that direction.

contentpilot/introduction

But as digital hardware proliferates, it will be impossible to keep this genie in the bottle. The potential commercial applications are just too numerous and profitable to expect such restraint from all service providers. Indeed, multiple hackers currently testing the Explorer Edition of Glass have <a href="http://rt.com/usa/google-glass-facial-recognition-hack-285/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">already</a> given it facial recognition capability. Augmented reality concept videos are chock full of examples in which digital data—including links to their <a href="http://www.pinterest.com/pin/23784704251936023/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">social media profiles</a>, <a href="http://www.pinterest.com/pin/23784704251935993/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dating service information</a>, even whether they’re a <a href="http://www.pinterest.com/pin/23784704251915996/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">registered sex offender</a>—is seen hovering in the air over a person’s head. Facial recognition is by far the easiest and most direct means by which to associate such displays with a particular person.

core/paragraph

The main concern voiced about this technology to date has been “privacy,” although society in general seems to have no consensus about what that word actually means. I expect that the <a href="http://www.wassom.com/?s=right+of+publicity" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">right of publicity</a>—that weird, state-law transitional species between the common law of privacy and intellectual property—will play an increasingly prominent role in this debate going forward. To see why, just follow the money. Privacy law is about keeping things out of the public view. Publicity rights, on the other hand, allow the person whose likeness is being exploited to profit from it.

Before long, someone is going to make the argument that facial recognition technology infringes the publicity rights of the person being scanned. I am actually surprised that no one seems to have made this argument in court yet. Right of publicity law regulates the commercial exploitation of a person’s identity, which is generally thought to include at least their physical appearance. The same commercial forces that guarantee the expansion of facial recognition will also provide plenty of evidence demonstrating the commercial value of the data. It will not take a scholar to connect the dots and argue that the people scanned should recoup a portion of any money made from their biometric data.

Whether this argument gains any traction is another matter. Biometric data is already widely used for entirely utilitarian (and especially security) purposes—witness, for example, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/stop-worrying-about-the-new-iphones-fingerprint-scanne-1326146704" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">fingerprint scanner</a> in the new iPhone 5S. Allowing people to own intellectual property rights in that data might complicate matters too much for that technology to remain useful, to the detriment of society as a whole.

And then there is the very substantial hurdle of First Amendment rights to consider. The same fundamental legal principle that safeguards our freedom of speech also protects our right to record events in public and to portray real people in fictional works. &nbsp;Courts in several jurisdictions (including in cases I've litigated) have already imposed severe restrictions on publicity rights in order to avoid interfering with these rights.

Although we can't yet predict how these arguments will pan out in various courts or circumstances, one thing is for certain: they're coming.

Augmented Legality

Emerging Media and Technologies

Partner

Brian D. Wassom

Information Technology Transactions

Publicity Rights in Facial Recognition and Other Biometric Data

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

Publicity Rights in Facial Recognition and Other Biometric Data

professionals