Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

In&nbsp;<a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/20150930_S151053_81_01_151053_2015-09-30_or.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">City of Holland v. Consumers Energy Co., No. 151053</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/20150930_S151051_65_01_151051_2015-09-30_or.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">City of Coldwater v. Consumers Energy Co., No. 151051</a>, the Michigan Supreme Court scheduled oral argument to consider whether to grant defendant’s application for leave to appeal.&nbsp; The court directed the parties to file supplemental briefs to address (1) whether it is lawful for customers to receive electrical services by a municipality outside of that municipality’s boundary, provided that no other utility company was presently providing the services, and (2) whether Michigan’s Public Service Commission (“PSC”) has the authority to regulate municipal distribution of electrical services.

contentpilot/introduction

In both cases, blogged <a href="http://www.wnj.com/Blogs/Appellate/January-2015/COA-holds-municipalities-may-provide-electrical-de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>, electrical customers outside the boundaries of Holland and Coldwater opted to receive electricity from those municipalities rather than from Consumers Energy.&nbsp; Consumers argued that under MCL 124.3, a municipal corporation could not render electric delivery services for heat, power, or light to customers outside the corporate limits who are already receiving the services from another utility.&nbsp; Consumers further maintained that under the PSC, the first utility company serving a customer is entitled to continue serving that customer.

core/paragraph

The Michigan Court of Appeals, in a consolidated opinion, held that MCL 124.3 only prohibits a municipality from providing electrical services to customers outside of the municipal limits if another provider is presently providing services.&nbsp; In both cases, while Consumers had previously provided services to these customers, it was currently not doing so.&nbsp; The court also held that under MCL 460.6, the PSC has complete power and jurisdiction to regulate all public utilities except a municipally owned utility.

The Michigan Supreme Court scheduled oral arguments on whether to grant defendant’s leave to appeal.

Partner

Gaëtan Gerville-Réache

Labor and Employment

MSC to address whether customers may receive electrical services by a municipality outside of that municipality’s boundary

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000.

MSC to address whether customers may receive electrical services by a municipality outside of that municipality’s boundary

professionals