Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

The Michigan Supreme Court granted mini-oral argument <em>in </em><a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/20151223_S151277_77_01_151277_2015-12-23_or.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Arbuckle v. General Motors LLC</em></a>, No. 151277, to consider whether the plaintiff’s action challenging the offset of social security disability insurance benefits against his worker’s compensation benefits is preempted by federal law and whether it is governed by state or federal law. 

contentpilot/introduction

Clifton Arbuckle was injured during the course of his employment in 1991.&nbsp; Four years later, a worker’s compensation magistrate awarded Arbuckle workers’ compensation benefits that were not reduced by his disability pension and disability insurance benefits.&nbsp; In 2007, General Motors and the plaintiff’s union engaged in negotiations to establish a new formula for compensating active members and future disability retirees.&nbsp; Under the new formula, the plaintiff’s workers’ compensation benefits were reduced and offset by his social security disability insurance benefit (SSDI).&nbsp;

core/paragraph

Arbuckle challenged this formula at a hearing before the director of the Workers’ Compensation Agency, arguing that the use of SSDI benefits to offset the workers’ compensation benefit violated MCL 418.354(11), which prohibited coordination of benefits with SSDI.&nbsp; The director agreed.&nbsp; General Motors appealed the order to Magistrate Kenneth A. Birch, who likewise ruled that the defendant “was prohibited from coordinating plaintiff’s disability pension with weekly workers’ compensation benefits,” although he determined that MCL 418.354(11) was not violated.&nbsp; The magistrate also found that insufficient evidence to establish that the union had authority to negotiate on the plaintiff’s behalf and bind him to the new agreement.&nbsp;

Upon further review, the Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission (MCAC) held that General Motors did have the authority to coordinate plaintiff’s disability benefits with his workers’ compensation benefits and that the reduction did not violate MCL 418.354(11). &nbsp;&nbsp;But the Court of Appeals reversed MCAC’s holding, concluding that the defendant did not have the authority to coordinate the plaintiff’s benefits.&nbsp; The Michigan Supreme Court granted mini-oral argument to determine whether the Arbuckle’s challenge is preempted by federal law and whether it is governed by state or federal law.

Partner

Gaëtan Gerville-Réache

Labor and Employment

MSC questions whether worker’s challenge to union agreement that offsets workers’ compensation benefits against social security disability insurance is preempted by federal law

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

MSC questions whether worker’s challenge to union agreement that offsets workers’ compensation benefits against social security disability insurance is preempted by federal law

professionals