Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

In <a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/152844_81_01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Smith v. City of Flint</em>, No. 152844</a> the Michigan Supreme Court granted mini-oral argument to be accompanied by supplemental briefs on the application for leave to appeal to consider three issues. First, whether the Court of Appeals (COA) erred in applying<em> Peña v Ingham Co. Rd Comm.</em>, 255 Mich App 299 (2003), a Michigan Civil Rights Act case, to the plaintiff’s claim under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.361. Secondly, whether the plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to establish that he suffered an adverse employment action under the WPA.  Finally. if the plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to establish that he engaged in a protected activity under the WPA. The COA, which we blogged about <a href="https://www.wnj.com/updates/coa-under-the-whistleblowers-protection-act-an-adverse-employment-action-must-be-more-than-an-a-mere-inconvenience">he</a><a href="https://www.wnj.com/updates/coa-under-the-whistleblowers-protection-act-an-adverse-employment-action-must-be-more-than-an-a-mere-inconvenience" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">r</a><a href="https://www.wnj.com/updates/coa-under-the-whistleblowers-protection-act-an-adverse-employment-action-must-be-more-than-an-a-mere-inconvenience">e</a>, held that the adverse action against the employee must be more than a mere inconvenience, and Smith’s relocation was within the discretion of the employer and was part of Smith’s job duties. The COA also held that Smith was not engaged in a protected activity because his mere disagreement with the use of funds did not mean that the city engaged in wrongful conduct.    

contentpilot/introduction

Partner

Jason L. Byrne

Labor and Employment

MSC grants oral argument to consider the applicability of a Michigan Civil Rights Act case to a Whistleblower Protection Act claim

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

MSC grants oral argument to consider the applicability of a Michigan Civil Rights Act case to a Whistleblower Protection Act claim

professionals