Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

In <em><a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/20150702_S150957_96_01_150957_2015-07-02_or.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bank of New York Mellon v Jaafar,</a></em> No. 150957, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and found that an e-mail from Plaintiff’s counsel sent to Defendant’s Counsel requesting an increased settlement offer was not itself an offer. Instead, the Defendant’s response agreeing to raise its previous offer constituted the actual offer for contract purposes. Because this offer was never accepted, the parties were not bound to it.

contentpilot/introduction

Plaintiff, Bank of New York Mellon, filed a complaint against Defendants, Jaafar K. Jaafar and Badia Jaafar, for judicial foreclosure of real property because Defendants had defaulted on their mortgage. In the course of negotiating a settlement, Plaintiff’s counsel asked Defendant’s counsel, “Would your client be willing to increase the offer by $5k [to $265,000]? Please advise me of your client’s decision.” Defendant’s counsel responded, “yes” and later asked if the $265,000 had been confirmed. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals held that Plaintiff’s request for an additional $5,000 was a valid offer, which Defendant accepted, creating a valid contract for a settlement agreement.

core/paragraph

Like the Court of Appeals’ dissenting opinion, the Michigan Supreme Court found that Plaintiff’s e-mail did not create a new and valid offer; rather, it was a request for Defendant to make a new offer. Defendant’s “yes” response was not an acceptance of an offer, but a statement that their own offer was renewed at $265,000. Because this was a new offer that was not accepted by Plaintiff, the Court held that there was no settlement reached, and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Labor and Employment

MSC: E-mail Requesting Increased Settlement Offer is Not Itself an Offer

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 