Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

The Michigan Supreme Court granted mini-oral argument in <a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/sct/public/orders/20151209_s151447_72_01_151447_2015-12-09_or.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Hobson v. Indian Harbor Insurance</em></a>, No. 151447, to address whether the Total Pollution Exclusion Endorsement in Indian Harbor Insurance Company’s commercial general liability policy is ambiguous and whether a discharge of a pollutant caused the injury that the plaintiffs-residents sustained during an apartment fire.

contentpilot/introduction

Wilson Investment Service and Construction, Inc. owned and operated the apartment building where Charlie and Mary Hobson resided.&nbsp; The Hobsons alleged that one of Wilson’s employees and managers negligently set a fire, which caused the Hobsons injuries and damages.&nbsp; The Hobsons attempted to recover for their injuries under Wilson’s commercial general liability insurance policy with Indian Harbor Insurance.&nbsp; The insurance company denied the claim and the&nbsp;Hobsons filed a complaint against the insurance company and Wilson.&nbsp; The Hobsons alleged that the policy covered Wilson’s negligence and the negligence of its employees, and therefore, the insurance company wrongfully denied coverage for their injuries.&nbsp; Defendants filed a motion for summary disposition, arguing that because the injuries suffered by the Hobsons included smoke inhalation, the pollution exclusion provision applied.&nbsp; The circuit court denied the defendants’ motion and the Court of Appeals denied the defendants’ application for leave to appeal.&nbsp; The Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the Court of Appeals and the Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court’s decision.&nbsp;

core/paragraph

The Michigan Supreme Court granted mini-oral argument to address the pollution exclusion and determine whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other action.

Partner

Gaëtan Gerville-Réache

Labor and Employment

MOA granted to discuss insurance policy’s ambiguous pollution exclusion

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

MOA granted to discuss insurance policy’s ambiguous pollution exclusion

professionals