Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

Premises liability is a negligence claim which seeks recovery from a facility for an injury allegedly caused by an unsafe condition on the premises. Such claims typically allege that those in control of a facility owe a duty to take sufficient precautions to prevent unreasonably exposing its guests to unsafe conditions on-site, but they failed to do so. Any facility open to the public or with customers, contractors, vendors and others regularly on-site, and tied to an on-site COVID-19 contamination, is a potential target for such a claim.&nbsp;

contentpilot/introduction

This post does not address employee and worksite issues related to COVID-19. For resources on handling employee and worksite issues, please listen to a recording of our recent webinar titled, “<a href="https://www.wnj.com/updates/webinar-labor-and-employment-update-preparing-the-facility-for-operations-after-covid-19" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Labor and Employment Update: Preparing the Facility for Operations after COVID-19</a>.” The focus here is on the extent of a facility’s duty to take COVID-19 precautions for its on-site business invitees and the steps a facility can take to mitigate its premises liability risk.

core/paragraph

core/heading

In general, a plaintiff filing a premises liability claim must prove the entity responsible for the premises: (1) owed a duty to take certain precautions to make the premises reasonably safe for the plaintiff; (2) the entity breached its duty by not taking sufficient precautions; and (3) the entity’s failure to provide a reasonably safe premises caused the plaintiff to suffer an injury and loss.&nbsp; &nbsp; In Michigan, the entity responsible for the premises is determined by who is in “possession and control” of the subject part of the facility. That can be, but is not always, the owner of the facility. An owner, for example, may lease some or all of the premises for someone else to conduct its business or operations. In such a situation, the lease often designates whether the landlord or tenant is in control of a particular part of the facility. If the lease does not clearly say who controls that part of the facility, courts often look at the action of parties – including who actually possesses, operates and maintains that part of the facility – to determine who controls it. Whoever ultimately controls the part of the facility in question may have an obligation to take certain COVID-19 precautions.

What precautions may be required of a facility depends on whether the injured party is on-site as a trespasser (without permission), a licensee (social guest) or an invitee (customer or business guest of the facility). Under most circumstances, a facility has no duty to take COVID-19 precautions for a trespasser. And, while a facility has a general obligation to maintain a reasonably safe premises for its licensees or social guests, it owes the highest duty of care to its invitees.   An invitee is someone on-site by permission and there for the commercial benefit of the facility. That typically includes, for example, store customers, contractors on-site to do repairs and vendors on-site to do business. For such invitees, a facility owes a duty: (1) to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition; (2) to warn invitees of dangers they know of, should know of or have created; and (3) to conduct reasonable inspections of the premises to discover possible dangerous conditions. Centered on a review of other communicable disease cases, including premises claims based on Legionnaire’s Disease, COVID-19 plaintiffs will likely allege that a facility owed its invitees the following duties: (1) to take action to prevent an outbreak or stem the spread of the disease on-site; (2) to take action to avoid exposing those on-site to the virus; and (3) to warn those coming on-site of any known or reasonably discoverable outbreaks or contaminations at the facility. See 2 Premises Liability 3d Section 38:1, 38.3 and 38.4 (2019 Ed.).   What constitutes sufficient action by a facility to avoid liability for a premises claim is currently not clear. Courts, however, will likely look at applicable federal, state and local government COVID-19 regulations and the guidance published by the CDC and other agencies to determine whether a facility did enough to protect its invitees. That includes, but may not be limited to, the cleaning and sanitizing, social distancing, hygiene and other practices recommended by the CDC, see the recommendations <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/organizations/cleaning-disinfection.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a> and <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-business-response.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>. It will also likely include OSHA’s <a href="https://admin.wnj.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/OSHA39901-Lance-Zoerhof-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19</a> and Gov. Whitmer’s stay at home orders, specifying what facilities may stay open and the COVID-19 precautions those facilities must take to operate. The preventative actions required by the Governor’s orders and recommended in the above guidelines will largely define what COVID-19 measures are expected of a Michigan-based facility.

Steps to Mitigate COVID-19 Premises Liability Risk

The following practices can limit a facility’s risk of being liable for a premises liability claim.

core/list

Some business and government leaders are pushing for liability protections for companies in the next COVID-19 relief legislation. A recent New York Times article titled “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/28/business/businesses-coronavirus-liability.html?referringSource=articleShare" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Businesses Seek Sweeping Shield From Pandemic Liability Before They Reopen</a>” addresses this topic. But, how broad these protections could be – if any are included in the next relief package – is unclear. You must therefore take your own steps to limit your facility’s potential exposure.

For questions or concerns regarding premises liability, please contact <a href="http://wnj.com/people/lance-r-zoerhof" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lance Zoerhof</a> at <a href="mailto:lzoerhof@wnj.com">lzoerhof@wnj.com</a> or your Warner attorney.

Senior Counsel

Lance R. Zoerhof

Real Estate Litigation

Supply Chain Litigation

Mitigating Premises Liability Risks Posed by COVID-19

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000.

Mitigating Premises Liability Risks Posed by COVID-19

professionals