Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

On April 23, 2020, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc., that a plaintiff does not need to demonstrate a defendant’s trademark infringement was willful in order to recover lost profit damages. Resolving a long-standing split in courts across the United States on this issue, the Romag decision provides an easier path for trademark owners to recover lost profit damages in trademark infringement actions, and counsels more caution from alleged infringers when defending against accusations of trademark infringement.

contentpilot/introduction

In Romag, Fossil had an agreement to use Romag fasteners in a number of its leather goods. Romag subsequently learned, however, that Fossil’s overseas manufacturers were using counterfeit Romag fasteners, with Fossil doing little to address the problem despite requests to do so. The district and appellate court both concluded that lost profit damages were not recoverable without a finding that Fossil’s infringement was willful. The Supreme Court disagreed, reasoning that the Lanham Act, which sets remedies for federal trademark violations, requires a showing of willfulness for a trademark dilution claim, but no such requirement exists for direct trademark infringement claims.

core/paragraph

Armed with Romag, trademark holders are provided a clearer and potentially easier path forward to recover lost profit damages for trademark infringement claims. While a defendant’s state of mind may be considered in determining whether lost profits are appropriate, requiring a showing of willfulness can no longer be a required precondition for recovery. Together with the Supreme Court’s landmark 2014 decision in Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health &amp; Fitness, which has had the effect of expanding trademark owners’ ability to recover their attorneys’ fees, there has never been a better time for trademark owners to aggressively defend the valuable goodwill in their brands.

For further questions or practical advice on how to pursue or mitigate litigation risk regarding potential trademark infringement claims, please contact <a href="http://wnj.com/people/brian-d-wassom" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brian Wassom</a> or <a href="http://wnj.com/people/r-michael-azzi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael Azzi</a>.

Executive Partner

R. Michael “Mike” Azzi

Partner

Brian D. Wassom

Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Enforcement and Litigation

Supply Chain Litigation

Trademarks and Brand Management

Infringers Beware – Supreme Court Holds Willfulness Not a Precondition for Awarding Lost Profit Damages in Trademark Infringement Actions

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000.

Infringers Beware – Supreme Court Holds Willfulness Not a Precondition for Awarding Lost Profit Damages in Trademark Infringement Actions

professionals