Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

The Michigan Supreme Court held in <a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/151899_66_01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">People v. Uribe</a>, No. 32112, that even though Michigan law permits the admissibility of evidence of the defendant’s past bad acts involving child sexual abuse, under certain circumstances, the admissibility of the evidence is not automatic.  There are several factors that should be considered in judging admissibility of this type of evidence, including differences between past acts and the current charged crime and the reliability of the evidence supporting the occurrence of the past acts.  Further any evidence of this type of prior bad act must still pass muster under MRE 403—it must be more probative than prejudicial.

contentpilot/introduction

Defendant was charged with five counts of criminal sexual conduct stemming from the molestation of his daughter’s half-sister.  The prosecutor attempted to introduce evidence that the defendant had also molested his own daughter, but the trial court excluded the evidence.  The <a href="https://www.wnj.com/updates/coa-prior-acts-of-csc-may-not-be-excluded-merely-because-jury-may-draw-propensity-inference" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Court of Appeals</a> reversed, finding that the trial court misapplied MCL 768.27a, based on analysis of the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in in People v. Watkins, 491 Mich 450 (2012).

core/paragraph

The Michigan Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeals that the trial court should not have excluded the evidence of the past acts of molestation.&nbsp; However, the Court disagreed with the Court of Appeal’s analysis of People v. Watkins, so the Court vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals, reversed the trial court’s ruling, and remanded the case back to the trial court.

Partner

Madelaine C. Lane

Labor and Employment

Evidence of prior acts of criminal sexual conduct is not always admissible under MCL 768.27a

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000.

Evidence of prior acts of criminal sexual conduct is not always admissible under MCL 768.27a

professionals