Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

Now that frigid temperatures are behind us, many people are looking forward to sunny weather and outdoor fun. With beach days, backyard barbecues, and bar crawls on the horizon, so is FMLA abuse. 

contentpilot/introduction

Employers have often used Facebook and other social media sites to investigate whether an employee is in fact using FMLA leave for its intended purpose. Employers should tread lightly before relying on such information, however, because courts are making it increasingly difficult for employers to prove their employees are committing FMLA fraud. &nbsp;

core/paragraph

For example, in&nbsp;<em>Brady v. Bath Iron Works Corporation</em>, the United States District Court for the District of Maine denied an employer’s motion to dismiss a former carpenter’s FMLA retaliation case where the employer suspended and later terminated the carpenter’s employment after he was spotted at a local bar having a beer while on FMLA leave. The carpenter claimed to have suffered from “chronic, serious mental health conditions, including depression and anxiety,” caused in part from work-related stress. When the employer discovered the carpenter at the bar, it sought clarification from the carpenter’s physician on his medical certification. Notably, however, the employer suspended the carpenter before the physician could respond. &nbsp;

In denying the employer’s motion to dismiss the case, the Court concluded that the carpenter’s having a beer at a local bar was “not a situation where an employee has been caught ‘red-handed’ engaging in an activity clearly inconsistent with the intended purpose of leave.” &nbsp;Stated differently, spending time away from work to enjoy a cold one might not be inconsistent with taking leave from work for anxiety or depression. &nbsp;

In&nbsp;<em>Jones v. Gulf Coast Health Care</em>, the employee was certified to take 12 weeks of FMLA leave for shoulder surgery. The medical certification received by the employer stated that the employee was unable to work during this period, and that he needed physical therapy to recover from his surgery. While out on leave, however, the employer discovered Facebook photos which showed the employee vacationing in St. Martin. The employer suspended the employee immediately upon his return to work, and terminated his employment a few days later. &nbsp;

Clear cut case of fraud, right? Not according to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. It found that the short amount of time between the employee’s&nbsp;return to work and his termination and the lack of&nbsp;clear documentation of the reason for the termination created a genuine issue of fact regarding the employer’s motivation for terminating the employee. With respect to the employee’s Facebook photos, the Eleventh Circuit found the evidence “murky at best” to show inconsistency with his medical condition. For example, the employer was unable to prove that the employee missed any physical therapy treatments as a result of the vacation. &nbsp;&nbsp;

So, can employees use FMLA leave as a means to vacation or enjoy a cold one? Not exactly, but these cases make it clear that relying on a stray Facebook post is not generally going to be sufficient to prove fraud. If you do find social media pictures or other evidence of behavior that seems inconsistent with the leave, gather the photos and any other evidence you can of the suspected fraud. Then, bring the employee in for questioning, offering the employee an opportunity to provide a formal statement regarding his or her time on leave. Oftentimes, an employee who has been out partying while s/he&nbsp;is supposed to be “home sick” will make false statements about what s/he has been up to. You can then terminate the employee for dishonesty rather than FMLA fraud, which is generally a better legal position to take. If you cannot prove dishonesty, you can still compare the evidence you’ve gathered to the certification form to see if it is consistent. If, at the end of the day, you don’t have enough evidence to prove fraud, at least you’ll have saved yourself from an expensive lawsuit. You might also decide to seek clarification and second opinions on the next request that comes in.

As these cases demonstrate, employers should thoroughly assess the circumstances surrounding an employee’s FMLA leave before deciding to discipline or terminate the employee for suspected FMLA abuse. In each case, you should consult with your Warner labor and employment attorney to determine the best avenue to combat and prevent such abuse.&nbsp;

Partner

DeAndre’ Harris

Jonathan P. “Jon” Kok

Labor and Employment

Curbing FMLA Abuse in the Summertime

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

Curbing FMLA Abuse in the Summertime

professionals