Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

The Michigan Court of Appeals held in <a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/OPINIONS/FINAL/COA/20150616_C320443_43_320443.OPN.PDF" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Simpson v. Alex Pickens, Jr. &amp; Assoc., M.D., P.C</em>., No.&nbsp;320443</a>, that an omission can serve as the basis of a wrongful death claim involving the death of a nonviable fetus.&nbsp; The court held that amendments made to the Wrongful Death Statute, MCL 600.2922, merely expanded the scope of actionable deaths to include the death of an embryo or fetus.&nbsp; The amendments did not force such an action to be brought under MCL&nbsp;600.2922a, which requires an affirmative act to cause the death in order to state an actionable claim.

contentpilot/introduction

Plaintiff Shakeeta Simpson brought this claim as the personal representative of the estate of the decedent Antaun Simpson, alleging that defendants were negligent providing her prenatal care and treatment causing the premature birth and death of nonviable fetus, Antaun, at 18.2 weeks gestation.&nbsp; Specifically, plaintiff claims that she suffered a miscarriage because her physician failed to perform a cerclage despite knowing that she had two previous pregnancy losses as a consequence of cervical insufficiency.&nbsp; Defendants sought partial summary disposition arguing that the amendments to the Wrongful Death Statute incorporate by reference the full text of MCL&nbsp;600.2922a which, in addition to providing a cause of action for the death or injury of an embryo or fetus, also requires the plaintiff to allege an affirmative act as the cause of death.&nbsp; Because plaintiff stated that an omission, rather than a positive act, was the cause of the wrongful death, defendants argue that the complaint fails to state an actionable claim.

core/paragraph

The trial granted defendants’ motion, holding that under the amendments, MCL 600.2922a must be incorporated into MCL 600.2922 because that statute refers to “death as described in 2922a.”&nbsp; The Court of Appeals reversed this decision and held that a plain reading of MCL 600.2922 shows that the amendatory language simply refers to another death that is actionable under the wrongful-death statute—the death of an embryo or fetus.&nbsp; The court held that the amendment merely expanded the scope of actionable deaths.&nbsp; Further, the court stated that the trial court’s interpretation of the amendatory language as incorporating the entirety of one statute into the other statute would contravene long-standing rules of statutory interpretation. Because this action was not brought under section 2922a, but rather under section 2922,&nbsp;plaintiff was not required to allege that defendants committed an affirmative or positive act as the cause of the decedent’s death in order to state a claim.&nbsp; Accordingly, the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

Partner

Jason L. Byrne

Labor and Employment

COA: Wrongful death actions on behalf of a nonviable fetus get same treatment as if brought on behalf of a “person”

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

COA: Wrongful death actions on behalf of a nonviable fetus get same treatment as if brought on behalf of a “person”

professionals