Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

For the first time since People v. Lockridge, the Michigan Court of Appeals has articulated a standard for analyzing the reasonableness of a sentence when it departs from the defendant’s advisory sentencing guideline range.  In <a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/OPINIONS/FINAL/COA/20151022_C318329_60_318329.OPN.PDF" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">People v. Steanhouse</a>, No. 318329, the Court held that trial courts should employ the “principle of proportionality” test articulated in People v. Milbourn.  Under this test, sentences must be proportionate to the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the offense and the offender.  If the sentence fulfills this principle of proportionality, it is reasonable.  In Milbourn, the Michigan Supreme Court recognized that departures from the guidelines are appropriate where the guidelines do not adequately account for important factors legitimately considered at sentencing.  The Court further stated that even where some departure appears to be appropriate, the extent of the departure (rather than the fact of the departure itself) may embody a violation of the principle of proportionality.  In deciding on the “principle of proportionality” test, the Court of Appeals rejected the abuse of discretion standard of review used by federal courts, because, unlike the federal system, Michigan courts are not procedurally bound to apply the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.   Defendant’s case was remanded in order for the trial court to determine whether defendant’s 30 to 60 year sentence was reasonable under the “principle of proportionality” test.

contentpilot/introduction

Partner

Madelaine C. Lane

Labor and Employment

COA articulates standard for “reasonableness” of a departure from the sentencing guidelines in post-Lockridge world

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000.

COA articulates standard for “reasonableness” of a departure from the sentencing guidelines in post-Lockridge world

professionals