Matthew T. "Matt" Nelson
- Partner
My admin
- Andrea Rule
industries
practices
- Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak, 132 S. Ct. 2199 (2012): Obtained 8-1 decision in favor of client, defeating claims of the federal government that sovereign immunity defeated client’s challenge to government’s agency action and that client did not have prudential standing.
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014): Submitted amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities supporting the successful religious employer.
- Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 132 S. Ct. 694 (2012): Submitted amicus curiae briefs at the petition and merits stages on behalf
- Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak, 132 S. Ct. 2199 (2012): Obtained 8-1 decision in favor of client, defeating claims of the federal government that sovereign immunity defeated client’s challenge to government’s agency action and that client did not have prudential standing.
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014): Submitted amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities supporting the successful religious employer.
- Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 132 S. Ct. 694 (2012): Submitted amicus curiae briefs at the petition and merits stages on behalf of the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities supporting the successful religious employer.
- Priority Health v. Commissioner of Office of Financial & Insurance Services, 489 Mich. 67, 802 N.W.2d 132 (2011): Persuaded the Michigan Supreme Court to overturn state agency ruling against a health maintenance organization.
- Tomecek v. Bavas, 482 Mich. 484, 759 N.W.2d 178 (2008): Obtained 4-3 ruling favorable to clients in an easement dispute involving the Land Division Act.
- O’Boyle v. Borough of Longport, 218 N.J. 168, 94 A.3d 299 (N.J. 2014): Submitted amicus curiae brief on behalf of DRI—The Voice of the Defense Bar successfully urging limited approach to waiver of work-product protection.
- Oneida Charter Twp. v. City of Grand Ledge, 485 Mich 859, 771 N.W.2d 785 (2009): Retained to obtain review by the Michigan Supreme Court of a published Michigan Court of Appeals decision regarding municipal water-rate dispute; persuaded Court to grant peremptory reversal.
- Winterhalter v. Dykhuis Farms, 2012 WL 2989238 (6th. Cir. July 23, 2012): Successfully argued for affirmance in an employment discrimination case.
- Mallison v. Haworth, Inc., 2012 WL 2580609 (6th Cir. July 3, 2012): Obtained decision affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer in an Equal Pay Act case.
- Keiper, LLC v. Intier Automotive Inc., 2012 WL 833652 (6th Cir. Mar. 13, 2012): Successfully argued for reversal of summary judgment in a million-dollar automotive-supplier dispute.
- Chen v. Dow Chemical Co., 580 F.3d 394 (6th Cir. 2009): Persuaded the Sixth Circuit to affirm summary judgment in favor of The Dow Chemical Company in an employment dispute.
- Sherrills v. Beison, 242 Fed. App’x 332 (6th Cir. 2007): Defended summary judgment in favor of a hospital system on a former employee’s race discrimination and retaliation claims.
- Canvasser Heritage, L.L.C. v. Fifth Third Bank, 2012 WL 5853896 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2012): Defended summary disposition in mortgage foreclosure case.
- Thomas E. Woods v. JLG Industries, Inc., et al, 2011 WL 2342719 (Mich. Ct. App. June 14, 2011): Defended jury verdict in a commercial contract dispute.
- Fifth Third Bank v. Canvasser, et al, 2011 WL 2347707 (Mich. Ct. App. June 14, 2011): Defended summary judgment in favor of bank in a mortgage case.
- Denney v. Dow Chemical Co., 2011 WL 92964 (Mich. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2011): Obtained summary disposition on former employee’s sex discrimination and retaliation claims and defended ruling on appeal.
- Old Republic National Title Holding v. First Metropolitan Title, 2010 WL 1056609 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2010): Persuaded Michigan Court of Appeals to reverse summary disposition against client in a commercial contract dispute.
- Foote v. Dow Chemical Co., 2010 WL 173777 (Mich. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2010): Obtained summary disposition on former employee’s breach of contract and tortious interference claims and defended ruling on appeal.
- Day v. HME Inc., 2007 WL 3120942 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2007): Obtained dismissal of former employee’s race-discrimination claims and, on appeal, obtained reversal of order denying sanctions against former employee for asserting frivolous claims.
- Multiband Co. v. Block, 2012 WL 1843261 (E.D. Mich. May 12, 2012): Obtained order enforcing arbitration agreement in employment dispute and imposing Rule 11 sanctions.
- Graham v. Access Business Group, LLC, 2011 WL 3758726 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 25, 2011): Obtained summary judgment on behalf of employer in a case involving FMLA retaliation and disability discrimination claims.
- El Camino Resources, LTD. v. Huntington National Bank, 722 F. Supp. 2d 875 (W.D. Mich. 2010): Obtained summary judgment on behalf of bank in case arising from $100 million Ponzi scheme.
- Programming Chair, “2022 DRI Appellate Advocacy Seminar,” November 1, 2022, San Diego, California
- “Michigan Supreme Court: New Members and New Rules, Attorney Client Privilege, Litigation and Discovery,” 2019 West Michigan Spring Symposium, Warner Seminar, Grand Rapids, Michigan, May 22, 2019
- Programming Chair, “2022 DRI Appellate Advocacy Seminar,” November 1, 2022, San Diego, California
- “Michigan Supreme Court: New Members and New Rules, Attorney Client Privilege, Litigation and Discovery,” 2019 West Michigan Spring Symposium, Warner Seminar, Grand Rapids, Michigan, May 22, 2019
- MSC grants leave to appeal to reconsider discovery rule
- MSC grants leave to address employer-minimum contributions for health-insurance plans
- MSC Order List: February 12, 2010
- MSC Order List: February 26, 2010
- MSC Order List: January 29, 2010
- MSC Oral Argument: In re Servaas
- MSC: Oral Arguments & Hearings This Week
- COA discontinues settlement program
- MSC Order List: September 11, 2009
- MSC Order: Lipnevicius v. Lipnevicius
- MSC Order List: September 18, 2009
- MSC Order List: September 25, 2009
- MSC Order: Oneida Charter Township v. City of Grand Ledge
- MSC Order: People v. Aceval
- MSC Order: People v. Chapman
- MSC Order: People v. Lonsby
- MSC Order: Rehearing granted in part in People v. Borgne
- Judge Saad to retire in November
- Michigan Supreme Court to Consider Enforceability of Wills Benefiting the Drafting Attorney
- COA: Voters have a legal right to enforce state election law requirements
- MSC to consider whether an insured claiming underinsured motorist benefits is a “third party tort claimant” entitled to penalty interest
- MSC to consider whether medical bills meet notice requirement for PIP benefits
- Prenups are not ironclad where divorce could leave one party destitute
- Executive Order was meant to extinguish already accrued but unpaid retiree benefit contributions
- MSC to determine whether an expert witness must establish specific causation in a toxic tort case to defeat summary disposition
- MSC grants oral argument to consider whether statute entitles stepchildren to wrongful death settlement proceeds
- MSC peremptorily vacates lower courts’ orders and remands termination of parental rights case to circuit court
- MSC grants oral argument to consider scope of district court funding and revenue sharing
- MSC grants oral argument to consider whether the Court of Claims has authority to determine compensation rate
- MSC to determine whether statute operates as statute of repose or statute of limitations
- MSC – Can courts address claims by church against former pastor for fleecing flock?
- MOA to review MACP denial of claim as obviously ineligible
- MSC may decide if a village clerk is a “public official” under the Open Meetings Act
- MSC reverses Consumers’ Use Tax exemptions for distribution equipment
- MSC to hear MOA on meaning of order that eliminated retiree benefit contributions
- Gov. Snyder appoints Oakland Circuit Judge Colleen O’Brien to the Court of Appeals
- MSC: Court to review judgment in favor of teacher who made racial “joke” in a third-grade classroom
- MSC to determine whether a mental health professional has a duty to prevent false accusations of childhood sexual abuse by parents
- MSC to hear mini-oral argument on the application of the 91-day extension for filing an affidavit of merit and whether billing records are considered “medical records
- MSC to hear oral argument on a railroad’s duties to maintain a safe grade crossing
- MSC: The prosecution has an affirmative duty to correct false testimony
- MSC upholds right to work for civil service employees
- MSC: Filing of a medical malpractice complaint before the notice period ends does not commence the action or toll the running of the limitations period
- COA Judge Donofrio to retire in September
- MSC to determine whether prenup trumps statute providing for spousal support
- MSC says law firms represented by own lawyers cannot get case-evaluation sanctions
- MSC to consider whether expert may testify in malpractice action if no longer certified in same specialty as defendant
- MSC to consider parameters of subject-matter jurisdiction for district courts
- MSC grants leave to appeal definition of notice within the Public Works Bond Act
- MSC grants mini-oral argument to consider whether the Insurance Code’s FOIA exemption violates Michigan’s Constitution
- Court of Appeals finds Ferris is entitled to attorney fees against law firm for frivolous case
- MSC Oral Argument: Henry v. The Dow Chemical Company
- 47 Warner Attorneys Named Top Lawyers by Grand Rapids Magazine
- Warner Attorneys Selected for Multiple Honors by Best Lawyers in America®
- Warner Attorneys Awarded Multiple Honors by Michigan Super Lawyers Magazine
- 66 Warner Attorneys Named Top Lawyers by Grand Rapids Magazine
- Warner Attorneys Selected for Multiple Honors by Best Lawyers in America®
- Warner Attorneys Selected for Multiple Honors by Michigan Super Lawyers Magazine
- Score One for Free, Fair Elections: Warner Secures Win for Kent County as Judge Quashes MyPillow Subpoena
- 108 Warner Attorneys Rated Best Lawyers in America
- 42 Warner Attorneys Recognized by Michigan Super Lawyers Magazine
- Michigan Supreme Court Rules that ELCRA Includes Protection Against Discrimination Due to Sexual Orientation
- Matthew Nelson Addresses SCOTUS Leak on WLNS-TV6
- 51 Warner Attorneys Rated 2022 Top Lawyers by Grand Rapids Magazine
- Michigan State Bar Recognizes Warner for Pro Bono Contributions
- 12 Warner Attorneys Named Lawyers of the Year
- 105 Warner Attorneys Rated Best Lawyers in America©
- 44 Warner Attorneys Recognized by Michigan Super Lawyers Magazine
- Warner Partner Matthew Nelson Joins Conductive Learning Center Board
- Warner Partners Author Detroit News Op Ed on Eavesdropping Law
- 35 Warner Attorneys Rated 2021 Top Lawyers by Grand Rapids Magazine
- 102 Warner Attorneys Rated 2021 Best Lawyers in America
- 45 Warner Attorneys Recognized by Michigan Super Lawyers Magazine
- Free Speech or Misinformation? Bloomfield Township Lawsuit Targets Social Media Posts
- Warner Protects Freedom of Speech in $9 Million Bloomfield Township Lawsuit
- Warner Attorneys Defend First Amendment in Bloomfield Township Suit
- 34 Warner Attorneys Rated 2020 Top Lawyers by Grand Rapids Magazine
- 52 Warner Attorneys Recognized by Michigan Super Lawyers Magazine
- One Hundred and Two Warner Attorneys Rated Best Lawyers in America
- 58 Warner Attorneys Recognized by Michigan Super Lawyers Magazine
- One Hundred Warner Attorneys Rated Best Lawyers in America
- 57 Warner Attorneys Recognized as Michigan Super Lawyers
- Fourteen Warner Partners Named Lawyers of the Year in 2018
- Ninety-Seven Warner Attorneys Rated Best Lawyers in America
- Two Warner Attorneys Receive 2017 Distinguished Brief Award
- SCOTUS Decision: Matthew T. Nelson Discusses Bank of America v. Miami with Bloomberg Radio
- 56 Warner Attorneys Recognized as Michigan Super Lawyers
- 90 Warner Attorneys Rated Best Lawyers in America
- SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Copyright Case Filed by Warner
- Warner Attorneys Lead a Successful Defense Case Involving the False Claims Act
- Decorative? Functional? Copyrightable? Warner Asks 6th Circuit to Review Decision on Cheerleader Uniforms
- 61 Warner Attorneys Recognized as Michigan Super Lawyers
- 98 Warner Attorneys Rated Best Lawyers in America
- 98 Warner Attorneys Rated Best Lawyers in America
- MSC Denies Review Where Whistleblower ‘Reported’ to Own Lawyer
- Supreme Court Expands Scope of Personal Jurisdiction Over Corporations
- Michigan Supreme Court Rules that ELCRA Includes Protection Against Discrimination Due to Sexual Orientation
- Supreme Court Decisions Leave Employers Guessing
- MSC grants leave to appeal to reconsider discovery rule
- MSC grants leave to address employer-minimum contributions for health-insurance plans
- MSC Order List: February 12, 2010
- MSC Order List: February 26, 2010
- MSC Order List: January 29, 2010
- MSC Oral Argument: In re Servaas
- MSC: Oral Arguments & Hearings This Week
- COA discontinues settlement program
- MSC Order List: September 11, 2009
- MSC Order: Lipnevicius v. Lipnevicius
- MI Supreme Court Doubles Down: Governor’s Executive Orders Are Void
- The State of Mask Requirements and Other Limitations
- MI Supreme Court Rules Against Governor’s Executive Orders
- Federal Court Upholds Testing Requirements for Agricultural Workers
- Sixth Circuit’s Title IX Ruling Raises Specter of Simultaneous Liability to Victims and Accused Harassers
- Judge Saad to retire in November
- Michigan Supreme Court to Consider Enforceability of Wills Benefiting the Drafting Attorney
- COA: Voters have a legal right to enforce state election law requirements
- MSC to consider whether an insured claiming underinsured motorist benefits is a “third party tort claimant” entitled to penalty interest
- MSC to consider whether medical bills meet notice requirement for PIP benefits
- Prenups are not ironclad where divorce could leave one party destitute
- Executive Order was meant to extinguish already accrued but unpaid retiree benefit contributions
- MSC to determine whether an expert witness must establish specific causation in a toxic tort case to defeat summary disposition
- MSC grants oral argument to consider whether statute entitles stepchildren to wrongful death settlement proceeds
- MSC peremptorily vacates lower courts’ orders and remands termination of parental rights case to circuit court
- MSC grants oral argument to consider scope of district court funding and revenue sharing
- MSC grants oral argument to consider whether the Court of Claims has authority to determine compensation rate
- MSC to determine whether statute operates as statute of repose or statute of limitations
- When Is A Useful Item Copyrightable?
- MSC grants mini-oral argument on whether a court must consider all seven factors in MCL 600.2955(1) when determining an expert witness’s reliability
- Legal Cloud Looms Over Michigan’s Vacation Rental Industry
- Supreme Court’s Recent Rulings a Mixed Bag for Employers
- “From the Amicus Committee,” For the Defense, July & August 2023 Issue
- U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief on behalf of the DRI Center for Law and Public Policy in Dupree v. Younger, March 10, 2023, Click here for a PDF of the brief
- “
- “From the Amicus Committee,” For the Defense, July & August 2023 Issue
- U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief on behalf of the DRI Center for Law and Public Policy in Dupree v. Younger, March 10, 2023, Click here for a PDF of the brief
- “A Pandemic Success Story,” dri™ Certworthy, August 4, 2021
- “Three Sixth Circuit Decisions Before the Supreme Court,” Law.com, The AM Law Litigation Daily, November 11, 2019
- “Unpublished but Binding? Federal Courts Give Near-Binding Effect to Even Unpublished Michigan Court of Appeals Decisions,” Michigan Defense Quarterly, January 2013
- Michigan Appellate Handbook (ICLE, 3d ed. 2014)
- The Federal Pleading Standard: A Year After Bell Atlantic v. Twombley
Testimonials
“Matt (Nelson) represented us on several very important litigation matters and also provided valuable advice on non-litigation matters. He was always very responsive to requests for assistance and was a clear communicator in all of his writings and conversations. Our litigation results with Matt were positive – they provided municipal officers the opportunity to effectively carry out their duties in a constitutionally and statutorily appropriate manner. Matt is an excellent attorney.” – Retired corporate counsel for a Michigan municipality